Wiggins trial gets underway in Rialto Shoting by Mike Cruz SB Sun

Wiggins trial gets under way in Rialto shooting

Mike Cruz, Staff Writer

Created: 09/30/2010 04:37:21 PM PDT

FONTANA - A trial of a man suspected in the 2007 shooting death of a Rialto police SWAT officer has gotten under way as police personnel have recounted the incident in court.

Officer Sergio Carrera suffered a fatal gunshot while he and other members of the Rialto SWAT team were serving a search warrant on Oct. 18, 2007 at a West Cascade Drive apartment.

While prosecutors allege Krist Antonio Wiggins killed Carrera with an officer's weapon, the defense has said that Wiggins did not pull the trigger.

Police served the warrant because they believed drugs were being sold from the residence, but no drugs or weapons were found there.

Wiggins, who is being held in lieu of $2 million bail, faces one count of murder and special circumstances that the victim was a police officer.

The trial is in Fontana Superior Court.

A recap of initial testimony:

FRIDAY, SEPT. 24

Police Officer Anthony Quinonez gave tearful testimony about the shooting death of Carrera, a fellow officer and friend, while serving a search warrant.

While searching the living room and kitchen areas, Quinonez testified that he heard gunfire down a hallway toward the bedrooms, yelling and the sound of people fighting. After yells of "Rialto Police Department - search warrant!" suddenly came the distressing call of "Officer down!" he said.

An emotional Quinonez, answering questions from prosecutor Cary Epstein, described how he saw two SWAT officers carrying a fellow officer through the hallway and back out of the house.

"He appeared to be limp, and he wasn't moving," Quinonez said. "I knew I lost a partner and a friend."

Rialto police have said they raided Wiggins' apartment, which he shared with a girlfriend and three children, because they suspected rock cocaine was being sold there.

Sheriff's investigators say Wiggins tried to flee down the hallway from the six-man SWAT team that came into the apartment. In a bedroom, Wiggins fought with SWAT Officer John Black, who had his AR-15 rifle slung over chest, authorities said.

The two men wrestled on the bedroom floor, with Black's rifle between them. At least one other officer also tried to help control and detain Wiggins when the first gunshot fired, according to investigators. Quinonez testified there was a pause and then two more shots.

TUESDAY

Piece by piece, Black put on his Rialto SWAT team equipment to show a jury how he looked on the day a search warrant ended with the death of Carrera.

First came the 30-pound protective vest.

Then came a duty belt followed by radio, flashlight, handcuffs and more.

Prosecutor Cary Epstein then handed Black his AR-15 rifle, which the corporal slung over his chest, and his handgun to slide in the holster.

Black testified the equipment added up to 40 pounds to his 180-pound frame on Nov. 17, 2007.

At a 5 a.m. briefing the day of the SWAT operation, Black said he learned of his assignment.

"Point man, No. 1," the corporal testified. Part of his duty would be to protect the rest of the officers behind him. "The No. 1 person is always the first person to go in the door."

Black's testimony in Wiggins' trial is key because he reportedly chased the defendant into a back bedroom, where he tackled him and fought aggressively to control him. During the struggle, Black's rifle fired and fatally struck Carrera near the bedroom doorway.

Prosecutors have charged Wiggins with murder and a special circumstance that the victim was a police officer. If convicted, Wiggins could spend the rest of his life in state prison.

After the briefing and various rehearsals in the police parking lot, the SWAT teams from Rialto and Colton police departments staged at Base Line and Riverside Drive, making last-minute preparations before boarding a Bear Cat armored vehicle to the location.

Earlier on Tuesday, Officer Carl Jones continued his testimony from the day before.

Jones and Black said they were told that drugs, weapons and gang members could be in the apartment, which was the justification for the heavy response.

Prosecutors asked Jones what the outcome might have been if Wiggins complied with their commands to get on the ground when the SWAT team entered the apartment.

"He would have been handcuffed, without incident," Jones said. Instead, Wiggins ran down a hallway when flashbang devices were deployed and the officers entered the front door, according to testimony.

When Jones got to the back bedroom, Black was on top of Wiggins, on the ground and fighting face-to-face, he said. Jones could see the barrel of Black's rifle under his right armpit and pointing toward the door opening, he said.

Jones said he drove a Taser into the abdomen of Wiggins, who screamed in pain for "the full ride."

But Wiggins continued to fight with Black, and then the rifle fired.

Black was surprised to learn that it was his rifle that fired, and he didn't realize his rifle went off, Jones said. The witness said he could not see anyone's hands.

In a conversation later with a sergeant, Jones described the shooting as friendly fire, he said.

"Friendly fire, meaning it came from our weapon, yes," Jones said, agreeing that he used that term.

Carrera died at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center in Colton.

WEDNESDAY

Black testified he was in the fight of his life with Wiggins and was unaware of his rifle's position or that it had fired during the struggle, which killed Carrera.

Officers had been briefed that drugs were being sold at the residence and gang members could be inside, authorities said.

When SWAT officers came through the front door, Wiggins sat up on a couch, turned to look at Black, who was the first officer inside, and ran down a hallway.

Officers shouted commands, "Rialto police, search warrant," and "get on the ground."

Black followed Wiggins toward a bedroom, and the defendant charged at the officer as he came through the bedroom doorway, Black said.

"He lunges toward me with both hands," Black said.

Something then hit Black on the left side of his jaw.

The officer's rifle, which had been in a ready position, swung to his left side as he let go and pushed back at Wiggins. They both fell to the ground, with Black on top.

Wearing full SWAT officer gear and his rifle again in court, Black demonstrated the fight positioning with a sheriff's detective on the courtroom floor. Black said he could feel constant pushing pressure underneath from Wiggins, and the rifle was between the two men.

"I lost sight of his hands, and they went between us," Black said of Wiggins. The officer said he punched Wiggins repeatedly while yelling for him to stop resisting.

Black heard another officer yell, "Taser! Taser! Taser!" Then the rifle fired, and Black heard yells of "Officer down!" Wiggins was moaning.

Black said his focus was on Wiggins. He heard the shots behind him, but the corporal testified he was initially unaware of who did the shooting and who got shot. Black said he was unaware of his rifle's position and whether it had fired.

A rifle strike to the left side of Wiggins' head and a kick to his right side from other officers stunned Wiggins enough for Black to slip handcuffs on the still-resisting defendant. Wiggins said nothing throughout the incident, according to the corporal.

Black said he noticed shell casings and a rifle leaning against the wall. The barrel was pointing to the ceiling.

"I asked what happened, and they said it's your gun," Black said. "It didn't sink in."

Carrera was shot while standing in the hallway at the bedroom door. Two other officers carried him out of the residence.

Black said he was exhausted during what he called "a violent fight."

In his experience, the witness said his rifle has never come off him and it had never discharged without pulling the trigger.

Defense lawyer George Wright showed jurors a photo of a bloodied Wiggins, pointing out locations of the blood, and he focused on Black's statements to investigators.

Wright also questioned Black about a broken grip on his rifle and the trajectory of the bullets fired. The defense lawyer also asked Black if the SWAT team had been briefed on non-compliance at the location.

"I didn't expect that situation to take place," Black said. "We prepared for that situation to take place."

Testimony is expected to continue today.

Corporal testifies in trail for Rialto SWAT Officer's Death by Mike Cruz: Daily Bulletin

Corporal testifies in trial for Rialto SWAT officer's death

By Mike Cruz

Created: 09/28/2010 06:44:41 PM PDT

Piece by piece, Corp. John Black put on his Rialto SWAT team equipment to show a jury in the trial Krist Wiggins how he looked on the day a search warrant ended with the death of his colleague, Officer Sergio Carrera Jr.

First came the 30-pound protective vest, then came his duty belt followed by radio, flashlight, handcuffs and more. Prosecutor Cary Epstein then handed Black his AR-15 rifle, which the corporal slung over his chest, and his handgun to slide in the holster.

Black testified Tuesday in Fontana Superior Court that the equipment added up to 40 pounds to his 180-pound frame on Nov. 17, 2007, the day he tangled with Wiggins while serving a warrant at Wiggins' apartment on West Cascade Drive, in Rialto.

At a 5 a.m. briefing the day of the SWAT operation, Black said he learned of his assignment.

"Point man, No. 1," the corporal testified. Part of his duty would be to protect and shield the rest of the officers behind him. "The No. 1 person is always the first person to go in the door," Black said.

Black's testimony in Wiggins's trial is key because he reportedly chased the defendant into a back bedroom, where he tackled him and fought aggressively to control him. During the struggle, Black's rifle fired and fatally struck the 29-year-old Carrera near the bedroom doorway.

Police served the warrant because they believe drugs were being sold from the residence, but no drugs or weapons were found there.

Prosecutors have charged Wiggins with murder and a special circumstance that the victim was a police officer. If convicted, Wiggins could spend the rest of his life in state prison.

After the briefing and various rehearsals in the police parking lot, the SWAT teams from Rialto and Colton police department staged at Base Line and Riverside Drive, making last-minute preparations before boarding a Bear Cat armored vehicle to the location.

Black is expected to continue his testimony Wednesday in Fontana Superior Court.

Earlier in the trial proceedings Tuesday, Officer Carl Jones continued his testimony from the day before. Both Jones and Black said they were briefed that drugs, weapons and gang members could be in the apartment, prompting a heavy response.

Prosecutors asked Jones what the outcome might have been if Wiggins complied with their commands to get on the ground when the SWAT team entered the apartment.

"He would have been handcuffed, without incident," Jones said. Instead, Wiggins ran down a hallway when flash-bang devices were deployed and the officers entered the front door, according to testimony.

When Jones got to the back bedroom, Black was on top of Wiggins, on the ground and fighting face-to-face, he said. Jones could see the barrell of Black's rifle under his right armpit and pointing towards the door opening, he said.

Jones said he drove a Taser into the abdomen of Wiggins, who screamed in pain, for "the full ride." But Wiggins continued to fight with Black, and then the rifle fired.

Black was surprised to learn that it was his rifle that fired, and he didn't realize his rifle went off, according to Jones. The witness said he could not see anyone's hands.

In a conversation later with a sergeant, Jones described the shooting as friendly fire, he said.

"Friendly fire, meaning it came from our weapon, yes," Jones said, agreeing that he used that term.

Carrera later died at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, in Colton.

Partner gives tearful testimony in fatal 2007 shooting of Rialto Police Officer.. by Mike Cruz SB Sun

Partner gives tearful testimony in fatal 2007 shooting of Rialto police officer

Mike Cruz, Staff Writer

Posted: 09/24/2010 05:29:34 PM PDT

FONTANA - Rialto Police officer Anthony Quinonez gave tearful testimony Friday about the shooting death of fellow officer and friend Sergio Carrera while serving a search warrant for suspected drug sales.

Carrera suffered a fatal gunshot while he and other members of the Rialto SWAT team were serving the warrant Oct. 18, 2007, at a West Cascade Drive apartment.

Krist Antonio Wiggins, who lived at the location, is on trial in Fontana Superior Court where he faces criminal charges in Carrera's death that, if he is convicted, could send him to state prison for the rest of his life.

While searching the living room and kitchen areas, Quinonez testified that he heard gunfire down a hallway toward the bedrooms, yelling and the sound of people fighting. After yells of "Rialto Police Department - search warrant!" suddenly came the distressing call of "Officer down!"

An emotional Quinonez, answering questions from prosecutor Cary Epstein, described how he saw two SWAT officers carrying a fellow officer through the hallway and back out of the house.

"He appeared to be limp, and he wasn't moving," Quinonez said. "I knew I lost a partner and a friend."

Quinonez is the first witness to testify in the trial. Wiggins faces one count of murder and special circumstances that the victim was a police officer. If convicted, the defendant could be sentenced to life in state prison without the possibility of parole.

Testimony is expected to continue Monday.

Rialto police have said they raided Wiggins' apartment, which he shared with a girlfriend and three children, because they suspected rock cocaine was being sold there.

Sheriff's Department investigators say Wiggins tried to flee down the hallway from the six-man SWAT entry team that came into the apartment. In a bedroom, Wiggins fought with SWAT officer John Black, who had his AR-15 rifle slung over chest.

The two men wrestled on the bedroom floor, with Black's rifle between them. At least one other officer also tried to help control and detain Wiggins when the first gunshot fired, according to investigators. Quinonez testified there was a pause and then two more shots.

While prosecutors allege Wiggins killed Carrera with Black's weapon during the fight, the defense has said that Wiggins did not pull the trigger.

Deputy Public Defender George Wright has also alleged that the search warrant was based on false information. No evidence of drugs or weapons were found in the apartment, according to authorities.

Both lawyers delivered their opening remarks to the jury, to start the testimony phase of the trial, shortly before 3 p.m. Thursday.

Wiggins is also wanted on a $100,000 warrant out of Grenada, Miss., on suspicion of selling rock cocaine. A judge had lowered the bail to $30,000 there, and Wiggins jumped bond, according to Grenada County Sheriff's Department.

mike.cruz@inlandnewspapers.com
909-386-3880

Woman in alleged Rialto Police Sex scandal to file lawsuit .. San Bernardino Sun 092310 by Josh Dulaney

Woman in alleged Rialto Police sex scandal to file lawsuit

Josh Dulaney, Staff Writer

Posted: 09/28/2010 05:10:16 PM PDT

RIALTO - The attorney for Nancy Holtgreve, a strip club worker at the center of an alleged sex scandal involving on-duty police officers, is moving forward with a lawsuit against the city after it recently rejected a $500,000 claim.

"I am going to go ahead and prepare a lawsuit on Nancy's behalf," said Danuta W. Tuszynska, the Riverside-based lawyer for Holtgreve. Tuszynska said the lawsuit may be filed by the end of October.

Holtgreve, a drink server at the Spearmint Rhino, alleged in her claim that several female employees of the club and police officers engaged in sex together at the Rialto Police Benefit Association's union hall. She named officers James Dobbs and Lamont Quarker in her claim, saying she had sex with each of them while they were on duty. Holtgreve alleges that she had sex with Quarker, a narcotics officer, in the Police Department's narcotics office. She also says Dobbs fathered a son she gave birth to in March.

According to Holtgreve, Dobbs, whose last day with the department was Aug. 12, intimidated and abused her after she demanded he pay child support.

The department won't say if Dobbs was fired or resigned, citing an internal investigation that has been completed and is under review.

Holtgreve alleges that Dobbs didn't want his relationship with her to hurt a custody battle with his ex-wife, or an alleged relationship with a woman who works in the department.

Dobbs and Quarker have not returned messages seeking comment.

Holtgreve alleges that the city fostered and perpetuated a culture of unwanted sexual harassment of women by male police officers, and that the department failed to protect her from Dobbs after she made authorities aware of the alleged intimidation and abuse.

In August, the city rejected much of Holtgreve's claim, saying it was not lawfully filed within six months of when many of the alleged incidents took place.

Tuszynska said the claim focused on the events which allegedly occurred after Holtgreve's son was born in March, but the city said that part of the claim didn't provide enough information to determine if there was a valid claim against the city, and it needed to be amended and re-submitted or no action would be taken.

While Tuszynska said the information provided in the claim was more than sufficient, she filed an amended claim.

The city has rejected the amended claim, which is why Tuszynska is preparing the lawsuit.

City Attorney Jimmy Gutierrez said there was very little added to the amended claim.

"I don't want to be insulting to this woman because she may have a valid claim," Gutierrez said. "(But) when I don't get a lot of vital information, that suggests to me that I don't have a valid claim."

Gutierrez outlined 42 issues in his initial response to Tuszynska.

He wrote, in part, that the claim failed to state the dates, times and places when Dobbs used his position as a peace officer to intimidate and threaten Holtgreve.

He also said the claim did not state the times, dates and places during which the city fostered and perpetuated a culture of unwanted sexual harassment of females by male police officers.

Gutierrez said the amended claim Tuszynska filed on behalf of Holtgreve failed to address the issues he brought up.

"She in no way came close to answering those questions or providing that information," Gutierrez said. "As I told her already, there is not enough information to evaluate if the city has any liability."

Tuszynska said the rejection is standard procedure and that most governmental entities reject "99 percent" of the claims that are filed against them.

"Our tort claim was more than sufficient to put this city on notice as to the various causes of action that Nancy has against the individual officers, as well as the city of Rialto," Tuszynska said. "Nonetheless, we will move forward with the lawsuit after the rejection."

Police Chief Mark Kling launched the internal investigation in May, which led to six officers. Four were placed on paid administrative leave.

Authorities have not named the officers on leave, citing the investigation under review.

Rialto Officer's Accused of Having Group Sex Parties While On Duty, KTLA NEWS... Woman claims she had a love child with an Officer...

Rialto Officers Accused of Having Group Sex Parties While on Duty

Woman claims she had a love child with an officer who refused to pay child support.
Watch Rebecca Hall's Report

KTLA

2:02 PM PDT, August 6, 2010

RIALTO -- A strip club waitress who says Rialto police officers had sex with women while on duty has filed a $500,000 harassment claim with the city.

Nancy Holtgreve alleges the San Bernardino County town perpetuated a culture of sexual harassment by policemen.

The claim, filed last week, says Holtgreve and other women at the Spearmint Rhino club had sex with officers in the Rialto Police Benefit Association union building - including group sex.

The department is investigating six officers.

Holtgreve also claims officer Officer James Dobbs abused and threatened her after she gave birth to his son in March and that the department failed to protect her.

Holrgreve filed a complaint with the department in July after Dobbs allegedly failed to pay child support and threatened her.

She says Dobbs didn't want to jeopardize his child custody battle with his ex-wife or his relationship with a girlfriend.

The 37-year-old waitress has also made several damaging statements to area newspapers about the habits of various Rialto police department officers, prompting police Chief Mark Kling to place Dobbs and three other officers on paid leave.

"This is not representative of this department," Kling said. "We are going to hold these officers accountable if these allegations are true. And if the allegations aren't true, we are going to do everything we can to clear their names."

Holtgreve told several media outlets that the ordeal has been a "living hell" for her.

"Just because you're a police officer, it doesn't give you the right to use intimidation," Holtgreve said. "I guess if you pay your union dues you can do anything you want."

Her attorney says Holtgreve will sue if her claim is rejected.

City Attorney Jimmy Gutierrez says the city isn't liable because Holtgreve had consensual sex.

Rialto Strip Club Linked to Policee Sex Probe. (by Josh Dulaney) San Bernardino County Sun

Rialto strip club linked to police sex probe
Josh Dulaney, Staff Writer
San Bernardino County Sun
Posted:

RIALTO - Internal investigators are probing claims that police officers were having sex on duty with employees of a popular strip club on Riverside Avenue, authorities said Monday.

"We've got confirmation that employees of the Spearmint Rhino were involved with officers in our department," Police Chief Mark Kling said.

Nancy Holtgreve, a 37-year-old server at the club, told the department in May that she had sex with Officer James Dobbs three times last year at the Rialto Police Benefit Association's union hall after she left work and while Dobbs was on duty.

Holtgreve said she and her co-workers after shifts frequently met Dobbs and other officers at a nearby 24-hour restaurant.

Neither police nor Holtgreve would confirm whether the other Spearmint Rhino employees were exotic dancers.

Holtgreve said she brought the allegations to the department because she feared for her safety when Dobbs allegedly abused and threatened her after she demanded he pay child support for their three-month-old son.

Phone messages to Dobbs though the union, at the police station and on his personal voicemail were not returned Monday.

"We know where Nancy works," Kling said. "We have talked to a number of people in this investigation and the investigation has taken us to a business and some homes."

Four officers have been placed on paid administrative leave while the department conducts an internal investigation.

Kling would not confirm the names of the officers on leave, citing the investigation.

Councilman Ed Scott, who owns a different downtown bar, said Monday he had heard rumors from his patrons that women who work at the Spearmint Rhino were involved with Rialto police officers.

"For about a week, that's what I had heard," Scott said.

Scott said he was very concerned about the allegations of officer misconduct.

"I'm concerned that a small group of them would be involved in any conduct like that with employees of any business," he said. "It certainly isn't the Spearmint Rhino's fault."

Kathy Vercher, the club's president and chief operating officer, said she was not aware of the investigation and did not want to comment.

The president of the Rialto police union said Monday he, too, was unaware of any misconduct at the union hall.

"I can unequivocally tell you that I've had no knowledge of that happening at the union hall," Sgt. Richard Royce said. "That's not what the hall is for. I do not condone and my membership doesn't condone that kind of activity."

Dobbs sometimes wanted to have sex at the union hall, where there were at least two beds, Holtgreve alleges.

Royce said there are beds in the hall, but those are for officers who need to rest after working double or graveyard shifts.

The hall, which is located near Ayala Drive and Base Line, is generally used by officers during off-shift activities and official union business, Royce said.

Royce said every union member has a key to the building, and "a lot" of city employees have one too.

But the union, in light of the allegations, has authorized funding for security upgrades that include new locks and potentially a surveillance system, he said.

"When this came to my attention, we took immediate steps to prevent it from happening," Royce said, but added: "I'm not saying it happened."

Only union members will continue to have a key or code to enter the building, Royce said.

"That's what they pay their dues for," he said.

Rialto scrambles to fund new pension costs
Josh Dulaney, Staff Writer
Posted: 01/23/2010 07:05:05 PM PST

RIALTO - At a time when local governments are looking to cut spending every way they can, this city is preparing to spend up to $5 million a year on upgraded pension packages for police, firefighters and other employees.

Budget plans for the 2010-11 fiscal year will have to account for the new "3 at 50" pension plan, which allows firefighters and police officers with 30 years of service to retire as early as age 50 and collect up to 90 percent of their highest annual salaries for the rest of their lives.

A slightly less generous improvement is also kicking in for the city's 400 general employees.

The combined pensions will account for roughly 10 percent of Rialto's $52 million annual budget, when they take effect next year.

City Administrator Henry Garcia had no luck in recent weeks trying to convince the workers' unions to delay implementation of the new plan because of the tough economy. The unions already gave up about $4 million in concessions to close last year's budget gap.

It'll be up to the City Council to decide where the money comes from.

"We're going to use reserves and look for funding sources that can fund it," said Councilman Ed Scott, who was among a 3-2 council majority that voted to approve the pension two years ago.

He added: "I have some faith and belief that the economy is going to turn around and we're going to find some revenue sources to deal with it."

Officials with the union representing Rialto police officers said their members have already given up plenty to help the city cope with the recession.

"We have given up pay increases, holiday hours. . .We'd given up a lot in advance so it's not a hardship on the city," said Richard Royce, president of the Rialto Police Benefit Association.

Representatives of the fire and general employees' unions could not be reached Friday or Saturday.

In the short term, the city will rely on its $31 million in economic reserves, a pot set aside for a rainy day.

Rialto isn't alone. The 3 at 50 pensions for public safety employees are as common in San Bernardino County as the government officials who worry the pricey benefit is unsustainable.

"I think in general there's concern about the retirement system across the state, the retirement system that serves government as a whole," Fontana City Manager Ken Hunt said. "Fontana is a very good system and it's very expensive. The question becomes, can it be maintained."

Last week, Orange County culminated years of negotiations about 3 at 50 when sheriff's deputies agreed to reduce the pensions for new hires. The move helps the county, but doesn't solve the long-term pension funding problem.

The thought of more local governments adopting new 3 at 50 plans in the current economy should be of huge concern to taxpayers, said Orange County Supervisor John Moorlach, who has long fought to roll back that county's 3 at 50 pensions.

"The pension contribution will be an ulcer in the budget because it will always grow and then you will have to bump other things out," he said.

A divided council

The 2008 effort to approve Rialto's new pensions was not unlike the debate that follows 3 at 50 proposals everywhere.

Supporters argue that police officers and firefighters put their lives on the line for the residents they serve, often shortening their own lives through wear, tear and exposure to a wide range of hazards.

As a result, they deserve earlier retirements and financial security.

"We're getting guys at 25, 26, 27 and they don't last much past 50," said Royce, the police union president. "This is a very hard career."

Some police and fire departments also worry about losing good employees if they can't match the pensions being offered elsewhere.

"I supported it because it's a tool the police chief needs to recruit some talent into the city," Scott said. "We had a history of not good recruitment, and when you're surrounded by municipalities that have (it), it's hard to match that."

Mayor Grace Vargas and Councilman Joe Baca Jr., joined Scott to approve Rialto's 3 at 50 pensions by one vote.

Vargas did not return a message seeking comment but Baca said the city owes it to the workers.

"We need to take care of our employees," he said. "They do a good job in the city and they should be awarded with a good retirement."

But critics argue the plans are far too generous, given the much more modest pensions typically found in the private sector. Another criticism is that, rather than spending their 50s playing golf, many maxed-out "retirees" take new jobs at other departments, collecting consulting fees or full salaries in addition to their 90 percent pensions.

"In economic terms, these people are millionaires and that's paid for by the taxpayers," said Steven Frates, senior fellow at the Rose Institute of State and Local Government at Claremont McKenna College.

Councilwoman Deborah Robertson and former Councilwoman Winnie Hanson voted against Rialto's 3 at 50 plans.

"It was just a very expensive thing and I felt the city could not afford it and I think I was right," Hanson said last week.

But voting against the interests of the police and fire unions might have carried a political price. Hanson suspects the vote might have cost her a 2008 re-election bid against Ed Palmer months later.

Robertson did not return messages seeking her reasons for opposing the pensions.

It's the type of issue that can make city leaders feel as if they're in a no-win situation.

"Somewhere, the line between public safety, public good and public costs needs to be debated," said Garcia, the Rialto city administrator. "People want public safety. Here's the cost, you pay for it and that's the way it is."

Some seek to roll back pensions

In Montclair, city officials have trimmed services, frozen job vacancies, reduced overtime and benefits, and borrowed $2.5 million in General Fund money to ensure the retirement program is funded.

And even before the current recession, they sought concessions from the unions on 3 at 50.

"Every agency is struggling right now and we all do it in different ways," said Edward Starr, deputy city manager in Montclair. "You don't want to do it on the back of the employees, but you also don't want to do it on the back of the community."

Montclair went to a two-tier system in 2005. Safety personnel hired after June 29 of that year would have a "3 at 55" benefit, while those hired before then kept 3 at 50.

Montclair's experience also illustrates how pension costs can change dramatically with modest changes in the retirement age.

Starr said if all cops in Montclair were on 3 at 50, it would cost the city roughly $1.6 million a year. If all were at 3 at 55, the cost would be about $560,000 a year.

Rialto officials hope to follow suit.

"We're looking at that," said Scott. "When we go to negotiations, we would ask the labor unions to consider a two-tiered system."

Others want to take the discretion away from local governments.

A group called California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility has crafted an initiative for the November ballot that would drastically reduce pension benefits for future public employees.

According to the non-partisan Legislative Analyst's Office, the group's initiative would amend the state Constitution to limit defined-benefit pensions and retiree health benefits for state and local government employees hired on or after July 1, 2011.

The measure establishes minimum retirement ages, such as 58 for new cops and firefighters, and 60 for other public safety employees. All other new employees would submit to the full retirement age as defined by Congress, which is 67 for persons born in 1960 or after.

"It's sucking money out of our economy," said Marcia Fritz, who helped craft the initiative. "It's our money and then people start drawing on these investments and then they (retire out of state)."

Fritz estimates the measure would reduce costs statewide by $14 billion over the first six years and $533 billion over 33 years.

In the meantime, Rialto officials realize they need to increase revenue. There are high hopes for a San Bernardino County expansion of the landfill here. Also on the table is a plan to lease out the city's water department and save maintenance costs. Consolidations of city departments are also being considered.

"Right now we're going to have to make some tough decisions," Baca said.

Some officials worry it might already be too late for some cities.

Moorlach, the Orange County supervisor, pointed to the Northern California city of Vallejo, which filed for bankruptcy in 2008, in part, because of expensive retirement packages.

"We're all trying to figure out who files for Chapter 9 bankruptcy first," he said, "whether it's in Orange County or San Bernardino County."

______________________________________________________________

BS Ranch Perspective:

I know this reference the retirement system that the city is claiming problems paying for, and that is that the RPBA took a 10% reduction in their pay, they have lost seven days of Holiday Time for the year, also they cannot build up more then Two Weeks of Comp. Time. They also are working on a very strict Schedule that doesn't allow Overtime Pay, they are asked to take Compensation time off, a thing that has been capped, to the point that it is only approx 80 hours cap, so if they work overtime and put in the compensation time as requested by the Management, & they start to exceed the cap, they are then asking for more trouble at work!

I know that this sounds weird since they are not paying now, they are paying the Officer with Time off, but if they don't have the manpower on the schedule they cannot allow anyone time off, that is where the Comp. Time reaches the cap fast and cannot be reduced as there is not enough Officers to make up a safe shift.

The pay cut, Holiday Time cap Reduction and Holiday Time reduction was done so that in the 1.5 years in the future they might be able to keep the Retirement Package, Rialto after all was working without this retirement package for three years before it was to come into existence.

Now that the time is Nearing, and they have asked the Police Department to take a Cut in Pay, and they agreed and complied, it has been really hard for a great deal of Officers to work through this cut in pay. I see it first hand Knowing Many of the Officers and their Families, the struggle has been difficult.

The City of Rialto has paid for the retirement Plan on the books for more then Thirty years, Paying the 9% of pay for the Current Retirement System, and now that they have agreed to new plan, a Plan that over 90% of all law enforcement currently have with the exception of the new hires for Orange County Sheriffs Department. Even the lower priced Departments have it, Departments such as San Bernardino Sheriff's Department, The Sheriff's department for the most part has a lower budget for their Deputies, and this you would think would make it harder for the SBSD to afford such a Retirement Plan, but they have had this said plan for close to Ten Years now.

Surly the Rialto Police Department can pay for this plan, by doing one simple thing, and this simple thing was forced upon the Police Department already and that is to tighten their belts. The Police Department Employee's have done this and they have not lost any of the officers to bankruptcy etc etc...

I am sure that the City of Rialto will be Okay, they have been Okay in the past and this is not anything to worry about, Unless the City Council Members make it hard for the Police Department. a thing that seems to be Par for the Course, since they made it such a big Headline and are attempting to make their own Employee's the bad guys like they did back in 2003 with the Contract Battle to close the Police Department and offered the job to the Sheriff of San Bernardino County!

That ended in a very embarrassing Loss to the City Council, Look at those council members that were against the Police Department, at that time, why even the Council Members that voted against the Retirement Package.. OOH THAT'S RIGHT, YOU CAN'T, THEY HAVE BEEN VOTED OFF THE CITY COUNCIL TODAY!!

BS Ranch

*Not being a Retired Employee, I am not positive on the Pay Cuts that were approved by the RPBA, especially in regards to the Holiday Time/Comp. Time. However I know that the Police Department took a TEN PERCENT cut in pay, and this was devastating for many to adjust to. This I do know first hand being friends with all my past work mates..

Energy Buyback plan means rooftop revenue for Homeowners (Press-Enterprise By David Danelski) Or Does IT?? (BS Ranch Perspective)

BS Ranch Perspective:

This law is not moving far enough to given enough incentive for those that want a solar power generation plant on their house, since you are only supposed to be generating less then or up to what you are using now, it leaves people with more of an option of paying off their mortgage first then making the huge investment in this power plant, that will not pay them enough to make a decent savings to their household!! If this power plant was to take their electric bill away from their monthly/yearly bills then there would be an incentive, but what would make and even more incentive would be to allow the homeowner to sell, power back to the State/City/or Local power Company, when they have not used as much power in their household as they have generated for that month. Sure that power that they got purchased from them would be considered to be income as a private Sales, this and only this, would lead to a way to drive people to conserve power!! Other then that if their power is reduced, yet they are still forced to pay a bill then they will take those savings and mark it as that SAVINGS, in there budget they might be easier to spend that money, but if it is marked as Earnings that would make it more likely to try to make more!! Other than that the speculation that people will try to save simply because their bill is reduced is a stupid assumption on their part!!!

BS Ranch

PS: this projected Change is bad, and the allowed buyback of power should be allowed at a profit from the homeowner!!

---

Energy buyback plan means rooftop revenue for homeowners

		Download story podcast

12:09 AM PST on Sunday, December 6, 2009

By DAVID DANELSKI
The Press-Enterprise

California residents who install photovoltaic solar panels on their homes soon could be paid by their utilities if they produce more electricity than they use, the result of a state law that takes effect next year.

But don't expect a rush of people installing rooftop solar units, observers say. Here's why:

To be eligible for paybacks, homeowners and businesses cannot install solar systems that generate more electricity than they've been using. In other words, they can't put in extra solar panels with the intention of selling power to the local utility.

Story continues below

Terry Pierson / The Press-Enterprise

Riverside homeowner David Morgan has a 2.3-kilowatt solar system on his home, and he says laws governing utility buyback of unused residence-generated solar power are moving in the right direction.

The law does not apply to the 1.4 million electricity customers of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.

Once rooftop solar accounts for 2.5 percent of a utility's total power supply, no further buybacks are required.

The law's backers hope it will move California toward capturing a huge source of clean power that doesn't require construction of new long-distance power lines or building energy projects on hundreds of square miles of desert land that otherwise might be preserved for recreation or wildlife habitat.

Enough sunshine lands on California rooftops to potentially generate 50 gigawatts -- nearly the total electricity the state uses on a hot day in August -- according to estimates in a 2007 California Energy Commission report.

Some say the law's restrictions expose lawmakers' reluctance to truly embrace the potential of rooftop solar, despite the state's mandate that utilities obtain 20 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by next year and 33 percent by 2020.

"We are getting a lot of sloganeering, but they are really just throwing us a bone, and it is not much of one," said David Myers, executive director of The Wildlands Conservancy, an Oak Glen-based organization that raises funds to acquire wildlife habitat for permanent protection.

The bill's author, Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, said the limitations were necessary to overcome opposition from large utilities, including San Diego Gas and Electric, and the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates investor-owned utilities, including Southern California Edison.

"I got the most I could get with this bill," Huffman said. "I'd like to see as much generation from as many roofs as possible, but this was a political compromise."

Opponents said the state already requires utilities to spend about $3 billion subsidizing the cost of rooftop systems through rebates. Those who benefit from the subsidies "do not need another opportunity to receive payment from the utility," according to an analysis by the Public Utilities Commission.

Damon Franz, an analyst for the commission, said in an interview that the rule limiting how much electricity people can produce will encourage people to install smaller systems, allowing the state rebate dollars to be distributed to more homeowners. Smaller solar systems also would encourage owners to reduce their electricity consumption, in order to get paid for the unused power, he said.

A MATTER OF COSTS

Bob Botkin, solar programs manager for Southern California Edison, said the company took no position on the bill. He added, though, that encouraging people to produce only the power they use helps eliminates the cost of distributing the power to other users.

Despite the bill's limits, Huffman said, it opens the door to electricity buybacks. He is hopeful that future legislation will lift the 2.5 percent cap.

Story continues below

Terry Pierson / The Press-Enterprise

David Morgan says he has enough roof space to accommodate solar panels that would supply 100 percent of the power for his household and one of his neighbor's homes.

Riverside resident David Morgan, who installed a 2.3-kilowatt solar system on his home a few years ago, said the law is moving in the right direction.

"It's on its way to be being a good thing, but it isn't going far enough," Morgan said.

Since his system provides about a third of his family's power needs, Morgan said the law gives him a financial incentive to add more solar capacity. He has enough roof space for panels that would supply 100 percent of the power for his household and one of his neighbor's homes, he said.

By the end of next year, utilities are required to set rates to reimburse customers who qualify for buybacks. Once the rate is set, residents can start earning redeemable credits for excess electricity they produce. The first checks would arrive a year later.

Huffman said under existing rules, utilities kept track of homeowners' excess electricity production. At the end of a year, if they produced more power than they used, the remaining credit was forfeited, infuriating some owners of rooftop systems.

In an e-mail to Huffman's office, San Francisco resident Douglas C. Horner Jr. wrote: "I'm not in the business of providing free power to PG&E on my dime. If they are not banking those credits, or sending me a check, then I might as well use as much power as possible ... "

INLAND ANGLE

David Wright, Riverside's utilities director, said he doesn't expect the limitations of Huffman's bill to slow rooftop solar progress in Riverside. The city is years away from seeing 2.5 percent of its power coming from rooftop solar systems, giving lawmakers time to increase the cap when necessary, he said. The city has about 107,000 meters; about 110 are connected to solar systems.

Even with local subsidies and federal tax credits, the cost of a residential solar system, depending on size, is roughly $20,000 to $50,000, akin to the cost of a new car. Consequently, few people would be inclined to build a system that produces more than their needs, Wright said.

The limitations in the law give utilities time to phase in rooftop solar and other alternative sources of electricity while paying off debts on conventional power plants, he said. Forcing the utilities to buy solar power too quickly could result in rate increases.

"It would be like paying two mortgages for two houses when you need only one house," Wright said.

Myers, of The Wildlands Conservancy, said the state needs to encourage people to invest as much as they can in rooftop solar, but instead it is setting up roadblocks that protect utility profits.

Such obstacles will result in more large-scale solar and wind energy development on previously undisturbed public land, as well as more power lines crossing public and private land to carry that energy to cities far away.

"It just doesn't make sense, when we are trying to convert to a green economy," he said. "The technology is ready and the roofs are on the grid, and no environmental impact reports are needed."

Reach David Danelski at 951-368-9471 or ddanelski@PE.com

San Bernardino International Airport Offers incentive to passengers airlines... Press Enterprise September 24, 2009

BS Ranch Perspective:

Does the Inland Empire need another Passenger Airport? The answer is Yes! Capitalism demands it! the more the better! That is right, the more competition that is offered the better the flights prices in the area and the more that people that travel will benefit from the airport or airlines for that matter will do great having an extra out in the Inland Empire! Either that or there is not enough people in this area to sustain a full on full service Air Port such as the one that San Bernardino is trying to offer the people of the Inland Empire! 

BS Ranch

San Bernardino International Airport offers incentives to passenger airlines

		Download story podcast

09:38 PM PDT on Thursday, September 24, 2009

By LOU HIRSH and KIMBERLY PIERCEALL
The Press-Enterprise

Looking to lure passenger carriers to a nearly completed passenger terminal, San Bernardino International Airport officials this week approved a long-discussed package of incentives, worth more than $2.5 million for each airline it can draw.

The incentives will be offered to up to four airlines that initiate commercial service. Officials during the past year have said that one major domestic airline is seriously examining the feasibility of starting service at the former Norton Air Force Base, while at least one more is considering it, though no carriers have been named.

The board of the joint-powers Inland Valley Development Agency, which oversees airport development, on Wednesday approved an incentive package that includes up to $1 million in revenue guarantees per year for the first two years of operation, and forgiveness of landing fees for five years.

It also provides for $500,000 in advertising and marketing funds, to help each airline promote its new services during the first year of operations.

"These amounts won't nearly pay all of the costs that an airline would bear to extend service, but it could make the difference in turning a profit on that service," said Don Rogers, interim director of the development agency.

Rogers said it costs an airline between $70 million and $85 million to bring new services to any airport.

Story continues below

Terry Pierson / The Press-Enterprise

The San Bernardino International Airport's new commuter terminal is nearly complete. Now the airport is moving to attract airlines.

He said money is already in the airport's budget to cover the incentives for the first two airlines that agree to start service, and funding for the other two will need to be finalized later by airport authorities.

Airport aviation director Bill Ingraham said the incentives will be offered only to airlines that can guarantee a minimum of 12 weekly departures.

Officials have said for several months that some kind of incentive package will likely be needed to attract carriers to the San Bernardino airport, in an economy where most airlines are cutting rather than adding services. "What we're doing here is formalizing that," Ingraham said.

Story continues below

Terry Pierson / The Press-Enterprise

San Bernardino International says one airline is considering landing at the airport and another might be interested.

Carriers have dropped flights over the past several months at facilities across the nation, including Ontario International Airport.

Ontario airport doesn't offer any incentives to new airlines, and the cost for doing business there is $14.50 for each passenger who gets on a plane, one of the highest in Southern California.

The Ontario airport's revenue relies on its airlines. As revenue has dropped and fewer airlines serve the airport, landing fees have risen to $2.76 per 1,000 pounds, and terminal rental rates have increased.

The San Bernardino facility's current landing fee is $1 per 1,000 pounds.

Thomas Nolan, aviation director at Palm Springs International Airport, said his airport offers incentives to new airlines on a case-by-case basis.

San Bernardino airport officials have said the main passenger terminal, which cost more than $80 million to renovate from its former military base use over the past two years, will be ready to accept commercial flights before year's end. Still being completed are final tarmac and parking lot improvements, as well as food and newsstand concessions.

Reach Lou Hirsh at 951-368-9559 or lhirsh@PE.com.

Reach Kimberly Pierceall at 951-368-9552 or kpierceall@PE.com.

What's offfered

San Bernardino International Airport officials this week approved measures to help encourage major airlines to add local service. Incentives would go to each of the first four airlines that bring in new flights.

Revenue guarantees: Up to $1 million per year for first two years.

Advertising and marketing funds: $500,000 during first year.

Landing fees: Forgiveness of payments for five years.

Source: Inland Valley Development Agency

Economic stimulus

This was an article from the St. Petersburg Times Newspaper on Sunday.
The Business Section asked readers for ideas on "How Would You Fix the Economy?"
I thought this was the BEST idea....
I think this guy nailed it!

What a Great Economic stimulus Idea, that will work.


Dear Mr. President,
Patriotic retirement:
There are about 40 million people over 50 in the work force - Pay them $1 million apiece severance with the following stipulations:
1) They leave their jobs. Forty-million job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They buy NEW American cars. Forty-million cars ordered - Auto Industry fixed.
3) They either buy a house/pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis fixed.
It can't get any easier than that!
PS If more money is needed, have all members in Congress and cabinet members pay their taxes for change........

---

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

Rialto to fight blight with Grant Money (Inland Daily Bulletin Sept 30, 2008) When is that Construction going to start for Rialto Renaissance??

BS Ranch Perspective:

 

Home improvement problems are important, but what I was wondering is when the Rialto Renaissance was going to get underway!! I am looking so forward to shopping in the new shopping center that once was the Historic Rialto Miro Field Airport!! That they were so eager to get rid of for a pipe dream of a, what TARGET STORE?

 

BS Ranch

 

---

Rialto to fight blight with grant money

Josh Dulaney, Staff Writer

Article Created: 09/30/2008 09:03:02 PM PDT

RIALTO - City officials are confident an injection of federal money will go a long way to curing the problem of eyesore properties. At the same time, they are touting two programs of their own to wipe blight from the landscape.

The city will receive about $5.5 million in grant money from Housing and Urban Development's $3.92 billion Neighborhood Stabilization Program designed to help local governments buy, fix and sell properties abandoned to foreclosure.

"We could intervene in the marketplace for a portfolio of single-family units," said Robb Steel, economic development director. "It could possibly be a financing mechanism for soft-second (mortgages) for buyers."

City leaders can also use the grant to demolish abandoned properties and offer down payment and closing-cost assistance to home buyers whose household incomes do not exceed 120 percent of area median income.

They can also create land banks to assemble, temporarily manage and dispose of vacant land for the purpose of stabilizing neighborhoods and encouraging reuse or redevelopment of urban property.

The city may also revitalize some of its troubled multifamily projects, Steel said.

He said officials are looking forward to two workshops where they will further explore their options.

At the same time, they are reminding residents of two programs they hope will curb blight and encourage more buyers to fill abandoned houses.

"Some of the properties out there are in pretty bad shape," said John Dutrey, housing program manager.

The Minor Rehabilitation Home Repair program will assist homeowners and first-time home buyers with repairs to their homes.

A homeowner with a fixed-rate mortgage on the house in which he lives may borrow up to $10,000 at a zero percent interest rate, to do repairs. There are no equity requirements, Dutrey said.

Qualified home buyers who purchase vacant, foreclosed homes will also be eligible.

Dutrey said some of the vacant houses need up to $20,000 in work.

The Emergency Mobile Home Repair program is a grant for owner-occupied mobile homes.

Mobile-home owners who need emergency repairs may apply for up to $7,000 to correct code violations, safety and hazardous conditions.

Applicants must have resided in the mobile home for at least one year.

Both programs require prospective applicants to meet low- to moderate-income guidelines, and the properties must be located within the city.

"We're looking to do two things with these houses," Dutrey said. "Get a family in, and get the property looking better in town."

Steel said the HUD grant may not necessarily go to the two programs, but that the projects it funds would not supplant them either.

For information on the city's home repair programs, call (909) 879-1140.

EPA ducks perchlorate standards (Contra Costa Times September 27, 2008) White House Edits Draft!!

BS Ranch Perspective:

Alright everybody that drinks water in the City of Rialto, get ready to suffer from Cancer and the like it is great that the government is standing by everything that we do for them! The Tax Dollars at work I always say. Drink up and get that Stomach Cancer and dwindle away to nothing! I have seen this happen first hand!

That is the scary part, and to have the Government, our Government turn their backs on the tax payers of the Inland Empire is beside me!!

BS Ranch

---

EPA ducks perchlorate standards

White House edits draft

Jason Pesick, Staff Writer

Article Launched: 09/27/2008 08:23:17 PM PDT

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not plan to set a drinking-water standard for perchlorate, a common regional contaminant used in explosives like rocket fuel and fireworks.

The decision, first reported by The Washington Post, came in a document indicating the EPA had made a "preliminary regulatory determination" not to set a standard.

The Sun has obtained a summary of the report from staff for the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

According to the summary, the EPA draft underwent heavy editing from the White House, and the EPA's original suggestion to have a 45-day comment period was reduced to 30 days.

Perchlorate has been found at 400 sites nationwide, including more than 100 in California.

Locally, it has been found in especially high concentrations around Riverside, the San Gabriel Valley, Redlands and Rialto, where the EPA is close to naming a 160-acre area a Superfund site.

Perchlorate can interfere with the thyroid gland, affecting metabolism as well as mental and physical development.

California has set a maximum standard of 6 parts per billion, and Massachusetts has set one at 2 ppb in drinking water.

In 2002, EPA scientists developed a draft protective level of 1 ppb for drinking water, assuming all perchlorate intake comes from water. In reality, perchlorate is also found in milk, breast milk, lettuce and other food sources.

The National Academy of Sciences

was then tasked with coming up with a recommendation and came up with a reference dose of about 20 ppb, assuming a body weight of 150 pounds and that all perchlorate is ingested through water.

Environmentalists and some members of Congress blasted the news as an example of the White House and Pentagon - much of the perchlorate contamination is at old Pentagon and defense contractor sites - influencing the EPA.

"The Defense Department's response to perchlorate contamination raises serious questions about the appropriateness of its role in the EPA's internal regulatory process," Rep. Hilda Solis, an El Monte Democrat, and Rep. Gene Green, a Texas Democrat wrote to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson.

The Sept. 23 letter asks for all communications on the issue since last year.

EPA spokeswoman Enesta Jones said the agency plans to issue the preliminary determination in the next couple of weeks and the final one by the end of the year but that "no decision has been made."

"This is an open and transparent process," she said.

Solis and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., have sponsored legislation to require the EPA to set a perchlorate standard.

In March, the Government Accountability Office criticized the EPA's risk assessment process and said it is not transparent enough and allows too much influence from other federal agencies, including the White House.

Boxer mentioned the issue at a May committee hearing.

"We had a full hearing on a GAO report ... and the fact that EPA is trying to shunt the scientists to the back, put the (Department of Defense) contractors to the front - at the table - and they said it's very dangerous," she said at the May hearing.

An EPA decision not to regulate perchlorate in drinking water would not have a major effect on Superfund sites with perchlorate, like the one on its way to Rialto, said Kevin Mayer, the EPA's regional perchlorate manager and a Superfund project manager.

Treatment systems the EPA uses in Rialto should remove all perchlorate from the water, he said, but the agency won't have to clean water contaminated at lower levels than the state standard, 6 ppb.

"In a Superfund program, we're required to meet federal and state standards, and we're required to assess the risks for those contaminants that don't have standards," he said.